← back to index

Supt%20Evaluation%20Proposal.pdf

Document typeproposal
Date2024-09-01
Source URLhttps://go.boarddocs.com/wa/kalama/Board.nsf/files/D98PAY63BE38/$file/Supt%20Evaluation%20Proposal.pdf
Entitykalama_school_district (Cowlitz Co., WA)
Entity URLhttps://www.kalamaschools.org
Raw filenameSupt%20Evaluation%20Proposal.pdf
Stored filename2024-09-01-suptevaluation-proposal.txt

Parent document: Board Meeting-09-23-2024.pdf

Text

DRAFT - Superintendent Evaluation, 2024-2025

Goal 1: Audit and Report Key District Functions

Objective: Conduct audits of key functions within the district: finance, communications, academics, special
education, safety, facilities, human resources, student services, curriculum, technology, athletics, transportation,
and food services. Use these audits to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of each function. Compile the findings
into an executive summary report with actionable insights and recommendations for improvement, to be presented

to the board.

Standards-Based Alignment:
e Standard 7 — Operations and Management: Effective educational leaders manage school operations and
resources to promote each student's academic success and well-being.

e Standard 8 — Collaboration with the Board: Effective educational leaders develop positive working
relationships and procedures that help the board of directors to promote each student's academic success
and well-being.

Audit
Completeness

Audit
Timeliness

Executive
Summary
Report

Only a few key areas
were audited, or
results were
incomplete and
lacked detail.

Significant delays
occurred in
completing the
audits, resulting in
missed deadlines.

The report lacks
clarity and depth,
with no actionable
recommendations
provided.

Some relevant areas
were audited, but
gaps in key areas
exist, and findings
were not consistently
thorough.

Some delays in
completing audits
occurred, but the
majority were
completed ina
reasonable time
frame.

The report outlines
key findings but lacks
detailed analysis and
only includes general
recommendations for
improvement.

Most relevant areas
were audited, and
results were
comprehensive,
providing insight into
all key district
functions.

All audits were
completed, most
according to the
planned schedule,
with minor delays.

The report is
well-organized, offers
in-depth analysis, and
provides clear,
actionable
recommendations for
each audited area.

All identified areas
were audited
thoroughly, with a
high level of detail
and insightful
findings for every
critical district
function.

All audits were
completed on
schedule, ensuring
ample time for

analysis and review
before the final
report.

The report is
well-structured,
providing deep
analysis with
comprehensive,
targeted, and highly
actionable
recommendations
that align directly
with district goals.



DRAFT - Superintendent Evaluation, 2024-2025

Goal 2: Lead the Creation of a New Strategic Plan

Objective: Develop a strategic plan based on audit findings and the district’s strategic needs, while ensuring
accountability for continuous improvement through key performance indicators (KPIs).

Standards-Based Alignment:
e Standard 1— Mission, Vision, and Core Values: Effective educational leaders develop, advocate, and enact a
shared mission, vision, and core values of high-quality education and academic success and well-being of
each student.
e Standard 6 — Meaningful Engagement of Families and Community: Effective educational leaders engage
families and the community in meaningful, reciprocal, and mutually beneficial ways to promote each
student’s academic success and well-being.

Clarity and
Feasibility

Stakeholder
Engagement

Accountability
for Continuous
Improvement

The strategic plan is
unclear, lacks
coherence, or is
overly

ambitious /unrealistic
in its goals and
timelines.

There was little to no
effort to engage the

school community in
the planning process.

The plan lacks clear
mechanisms for
accountability for
continuous
improvement.

The plan is generally
clear but contains
some elements that
are either not feasible
or lack clarity
regarding timelines
and responsibilities.

Stakeholder input was
sought but not
meaningfully
integrated into the
strategic plan.

The plan includes
some KPIs, but they
are not well-defined
or aligned with board
and district priorities.

The plan is clear,
realistic, and
actionable, with
well-defined
timelines and
responsibilities for
implementation.

Meaningful
engagement of a
broad cross-section
of stakeholders
occurred, and their
input is clearly
reflected in the plan.

The plan outlines
clear and measurable
KPIs aligned with
district goals.

The plan is highly
detailed, presenting a
clear, actionable
roadmap for the
district with realistic
goals, timelines, and
responsibilities.

Stakeholder
engagement was
exceptional, involving
families, community
members, and staff,
and their insights are
integrated into the
plan in a way that
fosters shared
ownership and
collective vision.

The plan includes a
robust system of
accountability with
well-defined,
measurable KPIs that
are directly aligned
with district priorities