Document type | memo |
---|---|
Date | 2023-07-01 |
Source URL | https://go.boarddocs.com/wa/msdwa/Board.nsf/files/D6FTC476A90B/$file/WSSDA%202161.pdf |
Entity | meridian_school_district (Whatcom Co., WA) |
Entity URL | https://www.meridian.wednet.edu |
Raw filename | WSSDA%202161.pdf |
Stored filename | 2023-07-01-wssda-memo.txt |
Parent document: Regular Meeting and Budget Hearing-06-26-2024.pdf
New Legislation Expands OSPI’s Oversight of Entities Providing Special Education Services By Dr. Tania May & Scott Raub are safe and supportive, maximize access to general education settings in their neighborhood school, create positive interactions with peers, and provide meaningful engagement with core curriculum. These ideals are especially important for students receiving special education services who have extensive support needs and are served in settings along the continuum of placement options, such as non-public agencies (NPAs). Ee: student has the right to educational services that The term NPA refers to any in-state private school/facility, or any out-of-state public or private school/facility, that a local schoo! district may contract with to provide special education services. A local school district, in some instances, may determine that it cannot provide free appropriate public education (FAPE) for a student with a disability within their district. In partnership with the student's family and teachers, as part of the Individualized Education Program (IEP) process, the IEP team may decide the student would be best served in a private school or facility better suited to meet the student’s unique needs. Recently enacted legislation Senate Bill (SB) 5315 - Special Education - Nonpublic Agencies affirms and expands upon the Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction’s (OSPI) responsibility to ensure that certain non-public entities (i.e., NPAs) are authorized to provide services to students who are eligible to receive special education services. Federal law requires states to have a process for ensuring that students eligible to receive special education services, who are placed in or referred to a private school or facility by a school district or other public agency, are provided special education and related services in conformance with a properly formulated IEP, at no cost to parents/guardians; are provided an education that meets state standards; and retain all the rights of an eligible student served by a school district in the state of Washington (34 CFR §300.146). Even when a student is being served by an NPA, the student’s school district remains responsible for ensuring that the student is provided FAPE as required by law. CONTINUED on next page JULY 2023 MODEL PROCEDURE 2161P Special Education and Related Services for Eligible Students MODEL PROCEDURE 3246P Restraint, Isolation, and Other Uses of Reasonable Force School District Oversight Responsibilities Aschool district remains responsible for ensuring that its students who are served by another entity are: ¢ Provided with a free appropriate public education (FAPE), ¢ Provided with special education and related services at no cost to the student’s parents and in conformance with the student’s Individualized Education Program (IEP), and ¢ Provided with an opportunity to participate in state and district assessments. School districts that enter into agreements with other entities must annually conduct an on-site visit to ensure that the authorized entity’s facilities, staffing qualifications and levels, and procedural safeguards are sufficient to provide a safe and appropriate learning environment for students. A school district may arrange for another school district to complete the annual on-site visit on its behalf, so long as the school district conducting the on-site visit provides a written report that documents the on-site visit results, including any concerns, to the contracting school district. Aschool district must provide the parents of the student being served with: ¢ Asummary of the processes and responsibilities for reporting incidents of isolation and restraint, and ¢ Acopy of the complaint procedure developed by OSPI. Aschool district contracting with an authorized entity must also report to OSPI and the State Auditor with any concerns. POLICY AND LEGAL NEWS =» WSSDA 13 CONTINUED from previous page The OSPI approval process for NPAs, outlined in Washington Administrative Code (WAC) 392-172A-04080 through WAC 392-172A-04110, sets the minimum requirements for when an IEP team determines it cannot provide an appropriate education for the student within the district. OSPI regularly monitors both school district and NPA compliance through procedures such as written reports, on-site visits, file reviews, policy guidance, and parent/guardian interviews. SB 5315 directs OSPI and school districts to play a more active role in the ongoing oversight of NPAs. The new legislation adds requirements in the following areas: * Expanding OSPI’s oversight authority for authorizing, monitoring, and investigating NPAs; * Requiring more frequent on-site visits to NPAs by OSPI and school district personnel; * Creating a complaint and investigation processes for NPAs; ¢ Adding additional minimum contract requirements for authorizing and reauthorizing entities as NPAs; ¢ Adding additional NPA data collection and reporting to JULY 2023 OSPI in areas such as attendance, graduation, and the use of restraints/isolation; and * Requiring OSPI to submit an annual report to the Legislature, made available to the public, regarding students placed at these authorized entities (NPAs). SB 5315 creates opportunities for the continued improvement of an important aspect of the overall system of supports available to students receiving special education services. OSPI is already at work beginning to implement changes to the NPA oversight process, including revisions to the NPA application, approval, and renewal processes. Conversations with partners from across the educational landscape are ongoing in order to learn about the various perspectives on the services made available to students with disabilities, their families, and the school and district partners who support them. Schoo! district leaders are encouraged to reach out to OSPI at npas@k12.wa.us with any questions, concerns, or suggestions. Dr. Tania May is the Assistant Superintendent of Special Education for OSPI. Scott Raub is the Assistant Director of Special Education Policy & Community Engagement for OSPI. Based on Senate Bill 5315 - Special Education - Nonpublic Agencies, WSSDA has revised: ¢ 2161P - Special Education and Related Services for Eligible Students, and ¢ 3246P - Restraint, Isolation, and Other Uses of Reasonable Force. These are both Essential policies. The revisions mainly impact the model procedures associated with the policies. The revisions to the model policies themselves are limited to updating legal citations and other references.