Document type | memo |
---|---|
Date | 2024-09-01 |
Source URL | https://go.boarddocs.com/wa/ohsd/Board.nsf/files/DACM7559CDEC/$file/SeptPolicyAlert.pdf |
Entity | oak_harbor_school_district (Island Co., WA) |
Entity URL | https://www.ohsd.net |
Raw filename | SeptPolicyAlert.pdf |
Stored filename | 2024-09-01-tpolicyalert-memo.txt |
Parent document: Regular Board Meeting-10-28-2024.pdf
SEPTEMBER 2024 Policy Alert To ensure that Washington school board members have access to working policies which align with current legal requirements, WSSDA contracted with the law firm Stevens Clay to assist in the development of a model student discipline policy and procedure to coordinate with OSPI’s new emergency rules, which were released recently. Additionally, WSSDA is releasing these documents without a paywall, so that all our members can engage in their own work without concern of falling on the wrong side of the new legal requirements. OSPI’s emergency rules are intended to give school districts more control and flexibility regarding supporting and managing student behavior. However, some of these new rules raise questions about how they should be interpreted and implemented in some situations. OSPI has indicated that it plans to address some of those questions through further rulemaking, both through the emergency and formal rulemaking processes. So, more changes are expected that should bring greater clarity. Most of the updates to WSSDA’s policy and procedure are based on three key changes that OSPI made through its emergency rules. First, OSPI replaced the term “discipline” with two new terms: “discretionary discipline” and “nondiscretionary discipline.” OSPI took those terms from RCW 28A.600.015. Accordingly, WSSDA updated its student discipline procedure by replacing the definition of “discipline” with those two terms. Further, because the definition of “discretionary discipline” uses the term “disciplinary action,” WSSDA has included examples of what might constitute disciplinary action. It pulled those examples from RCW 28A.600.460(1), which states: “Disciplinary action may include but is not limited to: Oral or written reprimands; written notification to parents of disruptive behavior, a copy of which must be provided to the principal.” Second, OSPI eliminated “other forms of discipline” as a defined term in the student discipline rules. It also removed the requirement for school districts to identify other forms of discipline in their student discipline policies and removed the requirement to attempt other forms of discipline before administering classroom exclusions and emergency removals. However, OSPI still uses the term in relation to suspensions and expulsions. For example, a school must still attempt other forms of discipline before short-term suspending a student and must consider other forms of discipline before long- term suspending or expelling a student. To reflect those updates, WSSDA has removed the term “other forms of discipline” from certain places in its student discipline procedure. Nonetheless, because the term is still used in relation to suspensions and expulsions, WSSDA decided to define it so that educators would know what to do before suspending and expelling students. School districts don’t have to adopt WSSDA’s definition. They could define it differently based on their local practices, or they could eliminate it as a defined term like OSPI has. Third, OSPI made changes to classroom exclusions. It redefined the term “classroom exclusion,” eliminated the requirement that other forms of discipline be attempted before excluding a student from the classroom, changed how long a student could be excluded, and gave school districts discretion about how exclusions are reported. Based on those changes, WSSDA updated the definition of “classroom exclusion” and the potential length of an exclusion. Rather than creating new reporting requirements, WSSDA left the existing requirements in its procedure untouched. However, once again, school districts could develop different reporting requirements if they wanted to. Lastly, although OSPI removed the requirement that teachers attempt other forms of discipline before excluding students from their classrooms, RCW 28A.600.020(2) requires them to attempt one or more “alternative forms of corrective action”’—unless there’s an emergency. So, WSSDA removed the requirement to attempt other forms of discipline and inserted the language from RCW 28A.600.020(2). At this point, what “alternative forms of corrective action” means is up in the air; the term is undefined. WSSDA chose to leave that term undefined. But, once again, school districts could choose differently. Please remember that these updates may change as OSPI continues to adjust the rules, and, of course, if that occurs, WSSDA will be prepared to supply our members with updated policy as well.